National Council of Teachers of English Logo

An Open Letter about Common Core State Standards from NCTE President Kylene Beers

July 28, 2009

Dear NCTE Members:

I have traveled throughout the United States this summer working with teachers across content areas and grade levels, in large urban areas and small rural communities.  In almost every place, teachers have asked what NCTE’s response is to the Common Core State Standards for language arts.  At times, some teachers have misunderstood what NCTE’s role has been in the development of these standards.  Other teachers have taken the time to write to me, with concern, about what the Council’s response will be to these national standards. 

I offer this letter to members to clarify what the Council’s role has been in the development of the Common Core State Standards with the hope that you will feel assured about the direction of the Council, the commitment of the Executive Committee to upholding long-standing Council values, and the promise of this president to always keep the needs of teachers and students first.

This spring, the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) convened a work group to draft a common core of state standards in math and language arts for grades K–12.  These college and workforce readiness standards were written by a group whose names were released to the public on July 1 by the National Governors Association, a partner in the initiative. While drafting the standards document, this work group received feedback from individuals.  Though one member of NCTE, Carol Jago, agreed to serve as a member of the feedback group, she did not represent NCTE in that capacity.

In late June, the Chiefs invited NCTE to offer a response to the draft of the standards.  Upon receiving that request, the Executive Committee met (via phone and Web conferencing) and decided that providing input on the draft was more advisable than not.  It’s obvious that we will have national twelfth-grade exit standards.  As of now, 46 states have agreed to adopt them.  Refusing to offer input means having no chance of influencing this document.  I’m not naïve enough to think that all suggestions for revisions we make will be followed.  At this point, though, the Executive Committee is dedicated to providing the input needed so that this document will be as aligned as possible with NCTE positions on key issues—positions enacted through democratic processes by NCTE members. 

So, the Executive Committee has convened a blue-ribbon panel of NCTE members to review the standards with NCTE policies and positions in mind.  Last week, this group received a copy of the ELA common core standards draft, and it is currently beginning its review.  Unlike the feedback group that provided advice to the CCSSO from each individual’s perspective, this NCTE review team will review the standards through the lens of NCTE policy. 

I have no idea what the Chiefs will do with the report they will receive from NCTE during the second week of August.  What I do know is that if we refuse to be a part of this process, then any chance NCTE has of making the document better is lost.  Perhaps the Chiefs will disregard any suggestions for revisions that are made.  But perhaps not.  That chance is why the Executive Committee chose to accept the offer to provide a review.

At this point, it would be premature for me to speculate on what will happen next.  I know that after the standards document is completed (early September) and released to the public, then the Chiefs will begin work on grade-level benchmarks.   The Chiefs have invited NCTE to be a part of that process, but the Executive Committee has not yet addressed this request.  It seemed hasty at best, ill advised at worst, to agree to do that before studying the end-of-grade-12 standards document carefully.  That is what is happening now with the review team.

I want each NCTE member to be assured that the Executive Committee is committed to upholding NCTE policies and positions.  If it becomes apparent that the standards document stands in opposition to those policies and positions, then NCTE will not hesitate to point out the discrepancies.  But to speak against the document before it has been reviewed could undercut our ability to offer a credible and cogent critique later in the standards setting process.  Additionally, NCTE will continue to support the position that while standards—a policy document—might be created by policy groups, assessments of student learning and curriculum/pedagogical choices that lead to achievement of  standards are best left to teachers. 

My goal for the Council is that policymakers turn to us first when they address policies and practices in English language arts.   So, yes, I was disappointed that the Chiefs did not consult NCTE when they began their work on the standards document.  However, once they did turn to us, I was happy that the Executive Committee agreed to provide input.  At this point, we are cautiously cooperative.  If that cooperative stance proves ineffective, then we will be respectfully vocal with our concerns.

Kylene Beers 
President, National Council of Teachers of English

Document and Site Resources

Share This On:

Comments

Anonymous commenting is not allowed. Please log in with an individual NCTE account to post comments to this page.

Most Recent Comments (49 Total Posts)

Posted By: Anonymous User on 11/9/2009 12:07:59 PM

Before the standards that were developed in each participating state was sent for final approval, at least one state, Illinois, made them public in October 2009 (accessible on the internet) and invited comments and input from anyone, teachers, parents, administrators, business, etc. Knowing this would have helped individuals who had comments and concerns to express their ideas. There should be no mystery about those standards. It would be helpful if NCTE would provide links to the progress of the standards to help others get an idea of what is going on. From what I understand, each state will have an opportunity to add their own standards to the national core standards. Teachers and others should be aware of this and if there is opportunity to express individual concerns, they should know about it.

Posted By: Anonymous User on 8/24/2009 6:51:15 PM

Tomorrow I meet with forty Middle School Language Arts teachers in a highly diverse urban school district for a discussion on how to provide Differentiated Instruction that will move all students toward the next level of their education. Standards are irrelevant to intelligent educators who teach students, not standards. Anonymous

Posted By: Anonymous User on 8/19/2009 1:30:30 AM

Kylene, If you have any chance at all to influence the core standards for reading, could you please change the word "explicitly"? As we both know, there is *no one meaning* to be derived from a text because the reader and the text together form the meaning. Please work with the policy makers to help them understand the reading process. Thank you, Reade W. Dornan

Posted By: Anonymous User on 8/7/2009 9:53:37 AM

As an ELAR teacher in Texas, I am actually a supporter of national standards. Unfortunately our state board of education was hijacked by some anti-public education people. They seem to get their educational philosophy and standards from the conservative entertainers on radio and television. The results are the total dismissal of input from the English teachers, and selection of ideas from a disgruntled english teacher from a small town. This is why I support national standards. For too long our process has been dominated by politicians on the local school board, legislature, and SBOE. Texas has not signed to co-operate, but one day in the future maybe major businesses will see the value. By then I will be retired, but I hope. My concern about the standards is that they don't end up with standards that would require a K-22 education as Robert Marzanno suggests is our current condition. Kylene, thank you for your thoughtful engagement on this critical matter.

Posted By: Anonymous User on 8/5/2009 2:37:38 PM

I appreciate the letter from Kylene Beers. She states: "As of now, 46 states have agreed to adopt them." The state chiefs and governors of the 46 states signed a Memorandum of Agreement that states that adoption is voluntary. The MOA does not require the participating states to adopt the national standards. Many states, like NCTE are cautiously cooperative.

Page Tools:

Join NCTE Today

Related Search Terms

Copyright

Copyright © 1998-2014 National Council of Teachers of English. All rights reserved in all media.

1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, Illinois 61801-1096 Phone: 217-328-3870 or 877-369-6283

Looking for information? Browse our FAQs, tour our sitemap and store sitemap, or contact NCTE

Read our Privacy Policy Statement and Links Policy. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use

Visit us on:
Facebook Twitter Linked In Pinterest Instagram