Student Evaluation and an Introduction to Academic Discourse: "I didn't like it, and I don't know how to improve it, because it works"
Michael Kuhne and Gill Creel

Drawing from the theories of Paulo Freire, Patricia Bizzell, and Ira Shor, this article describes a five-year ongoing classroom research project that examines the use of peer evaluation as a process for teaching academic discourse. The findings of the project suggest a critical and democratic pedagogical antidote to the national “standards” movement.

Subscribers - Log in to read full text User ID/Account ID: Password: Forgot your password? Log In by Institutional IP Access

Not a subscriber? Click here to subscribe to this journal - or - Click here to purchase a print copy of this issue