NCTE - The National Council of Teachers of English - A Professional Association of Educators in English Studies, Literacy and Language Arts
Search:
About NCTE Membership Professional Development Publications Programs Related Groups
 
The National Council of Teachers of English
- All Positions by Category
-    Assessment & Testing
-     Censorship & Intellectual Freedom
-     Class Size & Workload
-     Computers in Education
-     Curriculum
-     Diversity
-     Government in Education
-     Grammar
-     Instruction
-     Interdisciplinary
-     Language
-     Library
-     Literacy
-     Literature
-     Media Literacy
-     Multicultural Literature
-     NCTE Organizational Concerns
-     Professional Concerns
-     Professional Development
-     Publishers
-     Reading
-     Rights and Roles in Education
-     Standards
-     Teacher Certification & Preparation
-     Teaching Materials
-     Working Conditions
-     Writing
- All Positions by Level
- All Positions by Date
- Call for Resolutions
NCTE

- Parents & Students
- Press & Policymakers
Login to My NCTE Page
Shop the NCTE Catalog
 Assessment & Testing
Home > About NCTE > Overview > Our Positions > Positions by Category > Assessment & Testing > Article:107380
 

On Improving Interpretations of National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Data

 

1973

NCTE Annual Business Meeting in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

 

Background

Widespread misinterpretation of NAEP assessment results by individuals, news media, and other organizations caused concern in 1973 and continues to be an issue in testing.  Be it therefore

Resolution

Resolved, that the National Council of Teachers of English recognize the need for comprehensive reports on the findings and interpretations of the program for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP);

          that the Council express its concern to the director of NAEP that his staff exercise professional responsibility in releasing to the press and public results of the assessment tests in reading, literature, and writing. Such reports should include a clear, comprehensive explanation of the interpretation of these results, including a detailed description of their scope, validity, and methodology, as well as a description of any limitations found in the development and use of the tests; and

          that the NCTE Committee to Study the National Assessment of Educational Progress be instructed to move forward rapidly in its study and evaluation of the results of the national assessment with as much financial support as can be found and to prepare a comprehensive interpretation of the national assessment results and, further, that the committee membership include persons with expertise in reading, writing, literature, and curriculum; persons who work directly with those individuals being assessed; and persons who are minority members of NCTE.


 
 
 
Copyright © 1998- National Council of Teachers of English. All rights reserved in all media.
1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, Illinois 61801-1096 Phone: 217-328-3870 or 877-369-6283
Read our Privacy Policy Statement and Links Policy. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use.
Educator Resources:  Elementary  |  Middle  |  Secondary  |  College  |  Parents/Students  |  Press/Policymakers  |  Job Announcements